Ecuador vs Tunisia: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per

Ecuador
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Tunisia
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Ecuador rank
105th
Tunisia rank
103rd

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Tunisia
000000196119902019

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 103rd of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per, Ecuador or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per between Ecuador and Tunisia?
0 units per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Tunisia rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per?
Ecuador ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 103rd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Tunisia: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/tunisia/">Ecuador vs Tunisia: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 10,337 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.