Ecuador vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per
Ecuador
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Ecuador rank
105th
South Sudan rank
107th
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per over time
- Ecuador
- South Sudan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 105th and South Sudan ranks 107th of 193 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per, Ecuador or South Sudan?
- Ecuador, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per between Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per?
- Ecuador ranks 105th and South Sudan ranks 107th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.