Costa Rica vs Uzbekistan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per

Costa Rica
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Uzbekistan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
55th
Uzbekistan rank
58th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Uzbekistan
0000196119902019

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 55th and Uzbekistan ranks 58th of 193 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per, Costa Rica or Uzbekistan?
Costa Rica, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per between Costa Rica and Uzbekistan?
0 units per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Uzbekistan?
28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
How do Costa Rica and Uzbekistan rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per?
Costa Rica ranks 55th and Uzbekistan ranks 58th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Uzbekistan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/uzbekistan/">Costa Rica vs Uzbekistan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 10,337 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.