Austria vs Cuba: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per

Austria
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Cuba
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Austria rank
62nd
Cuba rank
59th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per over time

  • Austria
  • Cuba
00000196119902019

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Austria, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 62nd and Cuba ranks 59th of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Austria
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per, Austria or Cuba?
Cuba, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Austria as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per between Austria and Cuba?
0 units per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Cuba?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Austria and Cuba rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per?
Austria ranks 62nd and Cuba ranks 59th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Cuba: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/austria/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/austria/cuba/">Austria vs Cuba: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 10,337 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.