Burkina Faso vs Serbia: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per
Burkina Faso
0 units per person
in 2019
Serbia
0 units per person
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
32nd
Serbia rank
35th
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per over time
- Burkina Faso
- Serbia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Serbia, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 35th of 193 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per, Burkina Faso or Serbia?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Serbia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per between Burkina Faso and Serbia?
- 0 units per person, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Serbia rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per?
- Burkina Faso ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 35th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.