Belgium vs Cuba: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per
Belgium
0 units per person
in 2019
Cuba
0 units per person
in 2019
Belgium rank
71st
Cuba rank
70th
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per over time
- Belgium
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Belgium, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.
Belgium ranks 71st and Cuba ranks 70th of 193 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per, Belgium or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Belgium as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per between Belgium and Cuba?
- 0 units per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Cuba?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and Cuba rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per?
- Belgium ranks 71st and Cuba ranks 70th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.