Panama vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square

Panama
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Panama rank
109th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
112th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square over time

  • Panama
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00000196119902019

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 109th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 112th of 163 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Panama
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Panama
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Panama
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Panama
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square, Panama or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Panama, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square between Panama and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0 units per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Tanzania, United Republic of?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Panama and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square?
Panama ranks 109th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 112th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-per-square-kilometre/panama/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-per-square-kilometre/panama/tanzania/">Panama vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 8,046 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.