How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nepal?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Nepal: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square

Ecuador

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Nepal

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Ecuador rank

70th

Nepal rank

69th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square over time

Ecuador
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 69th of 163 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Ecuador
1970s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Ecuador
1980s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Nepal
1990s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Nepal
2000s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Ecuador
2010s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square, Ecuador or Nepal?: Nepal, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square between Ecuador and Nepal?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nepal?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Nepal rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square?: Ecuador ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 69th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Nepal: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/nepal/">Ecuador vs Nepal: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 163 places, 8,046 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.