Guatemala vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per unit of GDP

Guatemala
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Guatemala rank
64th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
62nd

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per unit of GDP over time

  • Guatemala
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0000196119902019

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Guatemala, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 64th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 62nd of 188 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Guatemala
1970s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Guatemala
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure management, per unit of gdp, Guatemala or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Guatemala as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure management, per unit of gdp between Guatemala and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Tanzania, United Republic of?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Guatemala and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure management, per unit of gdp?
Guatemala ranks 64th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 62nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-management-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-management-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/tanzania/">Guatemala vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 9,346 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.