Iceland vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per square
Iceland
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Iceland rank
161st
South Sudan rank
158th
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per square over time
- Iceland
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 161st and South Sudan ranks 158th of 190 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure management, per square, Iceland or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure management, per square between Iceland and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure management, per square?
- Iceland ranks 161st and South Sudan ranks 158th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.