Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per square

Congo
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Congo rank
181st
Equatorial Guinea rank
183rd

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per square over time

  • Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
000196119902019

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Congo ranks 181st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 183rd of 190 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure management, per square, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Congo, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure management, per square between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
0 units per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure management, per square?
Congo ranks 181st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 183rd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-management-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-management-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/">Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.