Kiribati vs Macau, China: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Kiribati
0.0008
in 2050
Macau, China
0.0183
in 2050
Kiribati rank
190th
Macau, China rank
188th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Kiribati
  • Macau, China
00.0050.010.0150.02196120052050

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 0.0183 against 0.0008 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0175.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 22.9 times Kiribati's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 190th and Macau, China ranks 188th of 192 countries.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Macau, China Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 0.0019 0.0019 Macau, China
1970s 0.0001 0.0026 0.0025 Macau, China
1980s 0.0001 0.0031 0.003 Macau, China
1990s 0.0001 0.0033 0.0032 Macau, China
2000s 0.0002 0.0046 0.0044 Macau, China
2010s 0.0003 0.005 0.0047 Macau, China
2030s 0.0005 0.0102 0.0097 Macau, China
2050s 0.0008 0.0183 0.0175 Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Kiribati or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 0.0183 against 0.0008 in Kiribati as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Kiribati and Macau, China?
0.0175, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Macau, China?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Kiribati and Macau, China rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Kiribati ranks 190th and Macau, China ranks 188th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Macau, China: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture/kiribati/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture/kiribati/macao-sar-china/">Kiribati vs Macau, China: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 10,721 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).