Eritrea, The State of vs Guatemala: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Eritrea, The State of
6.8
in 2050
Guatemala
7.68
in 2050
Eritrea, The State of rank
73rd
Guatemala rank
71st

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Eritrea, The State of
  • Guatemala
2468196120052050

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 7.68 against 6.8 in Eritrea, The State of, a difference of 0.88.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea, The State of's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Guatemala ahead.

Eritrea, The State of ranks 73rd and Guatemala ranks 71st of 192 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Eritrea, The State of averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea, The State of Guatemala Difference Ahead
1990s 3.76 3.78 0.0232 Guatemala
2000s 4.61 4.31 0.3017 Eritrea, The State of
2010s 4.95 5.71 0.7641 Guatemala
2030s 5.52 5.69 0.1623 Guatemala
2050s 6.8 7.68 0.8849 Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Eritrea, The State of or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 7.68 against 6.8 in Eritrea, The State of as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Eritrea, The State of and Guatemala?
0.88, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea, The State of and Guatemala?
29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2050.
How do Eritrea, The State of and Guatemala rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Eritrea, The State of ranks 73rd and Guatemala ranks 71st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea, The State of vs Guatemala: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture/eritrea/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture/eritrea/guatemala/">Eritrea, The State of vs Guatemala: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 10,721 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).