Macao vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per

Macao
0.0002 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Rwanda
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Macao rank
3rd
Rwanda rank
6th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per over time

  • Macao
  • Rwanda
0000196119902019

How they compare

Macao currently reports 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

Macao ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 6th of 190 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Macao
1970s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Macao
1980s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Macao
1990s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Macao
2000s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Macao
2010s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, per, Macao or Rwanda?
Macao, at 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, per between Macao and Rwanda?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Rwanda?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Macao and Rwanda rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, per?
Macao ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 6th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/rwanda/">Macao vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.