Georgia vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per
Georgia
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Georgia rank
142nd
South Sudan rank
141st
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per over time
- Georgia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Georgia, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 142nd and South Sudan ranks 141st of 190 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per, Georgia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per between Georgia and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per?
- Georgia ranks 142nd and South Sudan ranks 141st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.