Eritrea vs Sudan: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per
Eritrea
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Eritrea rank
155th
Sudan rank
156th
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per over time
- Eritrea
- Sudan
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 155th and Sudan ranks 156th of 190 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per, Eritrea or Sudan?
- Eritrea, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per between Eritrea and Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea and Sudan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per?
- Eritrea ranks 155th and Sudan ranks 156th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.