El Salvador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per

El Salvador
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
El Salvador rank
51st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
52nd

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per over time

  • El Salvador
  • Sao Tome and Principe
000000196119902019

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 51st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 52nd of 190 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per, El Salvador or Sao Tome and Principe?
El Salvador, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per between El Salvador and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 units per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sao Tome and Principe?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do El Salvador and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per?
El Salvador ranks 51st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 52nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sao-tome-and-principe/">El Salvador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.