How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Namibia: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per

Congo

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Namibia

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Congo rank

186th

Namibia rank

185th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per over time

Congo
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 186th and Namibia ranks 185th of 190 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Namibia
1970s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Namibia
1980s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Namibia
1990s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Namibia
2000s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Namibia
2010s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per, Congo or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per between Congo and Namibia?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per?: Congo ranks 186th and Namibia ranks 185th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Namibia: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/namibia/">Congo vs Namibia: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.