How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Botswana vs Congo: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per

Botswana

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Congo

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Botswana rank

189th

Congo rank

186th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per over time

Botswana
Congo

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.7 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 189th and Congo ranks 186th of 190 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Botswana	Congo	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Botswana
1970s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Botswana
1980s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Botswana
1990s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Botswana
2000s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Botswana
2010s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per, Botswana or Congo?: Congo, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per between Botswana and Congo?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per?: Botswana ranks 189th and Congo ranks 186th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Congo: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-rep/">Botswana vs Congo: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.