Ecuador vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per
Ecuador
0 units per person
in 2019
South Sudan
0 units per person
in 2019
Ecuador rank
69th
South Sudan rank
66th
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per over time
- Ecuador
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 69th and South Sudan ranks 66th of 190 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per, Ecuador or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per between Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 0 units per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, per?
- Ecuador ranks 69th and South Sudan ranks 66th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.