Hong Kong, China vs Mozambique: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, annual

Hong Kong, China
-0.4926 % change on previous year
in 2019
Mozambique
-0.2917 % change on previous year
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
144th
Mozambique rank
141st

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, annual over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Mozambique
-50050100150196219902019

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports -0.2917 % change on previous year against -0.4926 % change on previous year in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.2009 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 144th and Mozambique ranks 141st of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 6.57 % change on previous year 2.54 % change on previous year 4.04 % change on previous year Hong Kong, China
1970s 4.55 % change on previous year 0.9676 % change on previous year 3.58 % change on previous year Hong Kong, China
1980s -2.62 % change on previous year 2.05 % change on previous year 4.68 % change on previous year Mozambique
1990s -8.35 % change on previous year 20.66 % change on previous year 29.01 % change on previous year Mozambique
2000s -1.12 % change on previous year -0.0543 % change on previous year 1.07 % change on previous year Mozambique
2010s -0.07 % change on previous year 2.76 % change on previous year 2.83 % change on previous year Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, annual, Hong Kong, China or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at -0.2917 % change on previous year against -0.4926 % change on previous year in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, annual between Hong Kong, China and Mozambique?
0.2009 % change on previous year, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Mozambique?
58 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong, China and Mozambique rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, annual?
Hong Kong, China ranks 144th and Mozambique ranks 141st of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Mozambique: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils-annual-growth-rate/hong-kong-sar-china/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils-annual-growth-rate/hong-kong-sar-china/mozambique/">Hong Kong, China vs Mozambique: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 10,140 data points, 1962–2019
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.