Kazakhstan vs Kiribati: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square

Kazakhstan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Kiribati
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
174th
Kiribati rank
172nd

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Kiribati
0000196119902019

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 174th and Kiribati ranks 172nd of 206 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Kiribati Difference Ahead
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per square, Kazakhstan or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per square between Kazakhstan and Kiribati?
0 units per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kiribati?
28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
How do Kazakhstan and Kiribati rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per square?
Kazakhstan ranks 174th and Kiribati ranks 172nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Kiribati: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/kiribati/">Kazakhstan vs Kiribati: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 10,762 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.