Iceland vs Mauritania: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square

Iceland
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Mauritania
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Iceland rank
177th
Mauritania rank
180th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritania
00000196119902019

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 177th and Mauritania ranks 180th of 206 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per square, Iceland or Mauritania?
Iceland, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per square between Iceland and Mauritania?
0 units per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritania?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Iceland and Mauritania rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per square?
Iceland ranks 177th and Mauritania ranks 180th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritania: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritania/">Iceland vs Mauritania: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 10,762 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.