Estonia vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square
Estonia
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Estonia rank
70th
South Sudan rank
67th
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square over time
- Estonia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 70th and South Sudan ranks 67th of 206 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per square, Estonia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per square between Estonia and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per square?
- Estonia ranks 70th and South Sudan ranks 67th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.