What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per capita between Jordan and Sao Tome and Principe?

0 units per person, with Jordan ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Sao Tome and Principe?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Jordan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita

Jordan

0 units per person

in 2019

Sao Tome and Principe

0 units per person

in 2019

Jordan rank

173rd

Sao Tome and Principe rank

174th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita over time

Jordan
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 units per person.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 173rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 174th of 206 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Jordan	Sao Tome and Principe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Jordan
1970s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Jordan
1980s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Jordan
1990s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Jordan
2000s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Jordan
2010s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per capita, Jordan or Sao Tome and Principe?: Jordan, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per capita between Jordan and Sao Tome and Principe?: 0 units per person, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Sao Tome and Principe?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Jordan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per capita?: Jordan ranks 173rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 174th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-ipcc-agriculture-per-capita/jordan/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-ipcc-agriculture-per-capita/jordan/sao-tome-and-principe/">Jordan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per capita
Unit: units per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,762 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 23 August 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.