Congo vs Kiribati: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions, per square

Congo
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Kiribati
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Congo rank
172nd
Kiribati rank
174th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions, per square over time

  • Congo
  • Kiribati
00000199020042019

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 172nd and Kiribati ranks 174th of 208 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Kiribati Difference Ahead
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - farm-gate emissions, per square, Congo or Kiribati?
Congo, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - farm-gate emissions, per square between Congo and Kiribati?
0 units per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kiribati?
30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
How do Congo and Kiribati rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - farm-gate emissions, per square?
Congo ranks 172nd and Kiribati ranks 174th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Kiribati: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-farm-gate-emissions-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-farm-gate-emissions-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/kiribati/">Congo vs Kiribati: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 6,088 data points, 1990–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.