Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions, per square

Aruba
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Aruba rank
197th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
199th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions, per square over time

  • Aruba
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00000199020042019

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 197th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 199th of 208 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - farm-gate emissions, per square, Aruba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Aruba, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - farm-gate emissions, per square between Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 units per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
How do Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - farm-gate emissions, per square?
Aruba ranks 197th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 199th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-farm-gate-emissions-per-square-kilometre/aruba/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-farm-gate-emissions-per-square-kilometre/aruba/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 6,088 data points, 1990–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Farm-gate emissions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.