Ecuador vs Malawi: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural land
Ecuador
0 units per person
in 2019
Malawi
0 units per person
in 2019
Ecuador rank
103rd
Malawi rank
105th
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural land over time
- Ecuador
- Malawi
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Malawi, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 105th of 208 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - emissions on agricultural land, Ecuador or Malawi?
- Ecuador, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - emissions on agricultural land between Ecuador and Malawi?
- 0 units per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malawi?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Malawi rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - emissions on agricultural land?
- Ecuador ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 105th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural land, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Emissions on agricultural land divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.