Congo vs Iceland: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square

Congo
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Iceland
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Congo rank
165th
Iceland rank
168th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square over time

  • Congo
  • Iceland
000000196119902019

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 165th and Iceland ranks 168th of 184 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per square, Congo or Iceland?
Congo, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per square between Congo and Iceland?
0 units per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Iceland?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Congo and Iceland rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per square?
Congo ranks 165th and Iceland ranks 168th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Iceland: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/iceland/">Congo vs Iceland: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 9,657 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.