Papua New Guinea vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues, per

Papua New Guinea
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 units per square kilometre
in 2006
Papua New Guinea rank
160th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
162nd

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues, per over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00000196119902019

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 46 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 160th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 162nd of 184 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - burning - crop residues, per, Papua New Guinea or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Papua New Guinea, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - burning - crop residues, per between Papua New Guinea and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 units per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
How do Papua New Guinea and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - burning - crop residues, per?
Papua New Guinea ranks 160th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 162nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-burning-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-burning-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Papua New Guinea vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 9,614 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.