New Zealand vs Sudan: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues, per
New Zealand
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
New Zealand rank
144th
Sudan rank
146th
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues, per over time
- New Zealand
- Sudan
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 144th and Sudan ranks 146th of 184 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - burning - crop residues, per, New Zealand or Sudan?
- New Zealand, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - burning - crop residues, per between New Zealand and Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Sudan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - burning - crop residues, per?
- New Zealand ranks 144th and Sudan ranks 146th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.