Iceland vs Mauritania: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square

Iceland
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Mauritania
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Iceland rank
172nd
Mauritania rank
175th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritania
000000196119902019

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Iceland ranks 172nd and Mauritania ranks 175th of 194 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per square, Iceland or Mauritania?
Iceland, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per square between Iceland and Mauritania?
0 units per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritania?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Iceland and Mauritania rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per square?
Iceland ranks 172nd and Mauritania ranks 175th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritania: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritania/">Iceland vs Mauritania: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 10,367 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.