Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square

Hong Kong
0.0002 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Rwanda
0.0002 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
15th
Rwanda rank
16th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Rwanda
00000196119902019

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0002 units per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 16th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
1970s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per square, Hong Kong or Rwanda?
Hong Kong, at 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0002 units per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per square between Hong Kong and Rwanda?
0 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Rwanda?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong and Rwanda rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per square?
Hong Kong ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 16th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/">Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 10,367 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.