Brazil vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square
Brazil
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Brazil rank
96th
South Sudan rank
95th
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square over time
- Brazil
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Brazil ranks 96th and South Sudan ranks 95th of 194 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per square, Brazil or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per square between Brazil and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per square?
- Brazil ranks 96th and South Sudan ranks 95th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.