Equatorial Guinea vs Hong Kong, China: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU

Equatorial Guinea
0.0402
in 2050
Hong Kong, China
0.0347
in 2050
Equatorial Guinea rank
183rd
Hong Kong, China rank
186th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Hong Kong, China
0.050.10.150.20.25199020202050

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0402 against 0.0347 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0055.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 183rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 186th of 210 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong, China in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0296 0.0901 0.0605 Hong Kong, China
2000s 0.0318 0.0711 0.0392 Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.0342 0.1742 0.14 Hong Kong, China
2030s 0.0351 0.0325 0.0026 Equatorial Guinea
2050s 0.0402 0.0347 0.0055 Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, Equatorial Guinea or Hong Kong, China?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0402 against 0.0347 in Hong Kong, China as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu between Equatorial Guinea and Hong Kong, China?
0.0055, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Hong Kong, China?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2050.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Hong Kong, China rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 183rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 186th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Hong Kong, China: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-afolu/equatorial-guinea/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-afolu/equatorial-guinea/hong-kong-sar-china/">Equatorial Guinea vs Hong Kong, China: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 6,516 data points, 1990–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).