How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Rwanda?

30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre

Hong Kong

0.0002 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Rwanda

0.0002 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Hong Kong rank

17th

Rwanda rank

15th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre over time

Hong Kong
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0002 units per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 206 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Rwanda
2000s	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0.0002 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	Rwanda
2010s	0.0002 units per square kilometre	0.0002 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0002 units per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Rwanda?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Rwanda?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong and Rwanda rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per square kilometre?: Hong Kong ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-afolu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-afolu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/">Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 6,030 data points, 1990–2019
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.