Guinea-Bissau vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre
Guinea-Bissau
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
69th
South Sudan rank
67th
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 69th and South Sudan ranks 67th of 206 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per square kilometre?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 69th and South Sudan ranks 67th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.