How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Serbia?

14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burkina Faso vs Serbia: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre

Burkina Faso

0.0001 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Serbia

0.0001 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Burkina Faso rank

53rd

Serbia rank

55th

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre over time

Burkina Faso
Serbia

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 53rd and Serbia ranks 55th of 206 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burkina Faso	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Serbia?: Burkina Faso, at 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Serbia?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Serbia?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
How do Burkina Faso and Serbia rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per square kilometre?: Burkina Faso ranks 53rd and Serbia ranks 55th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Serbia: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-afolu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-afolu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/serbia/">Burkina Faso vs Serbia: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 6,030 data points, 1990–2019
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.