Czechia vs Eswatini: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per capita
Czechia
0 units per person
in 2019
Eswatini
0 units per person
in 2019
Czechia rank
65th
Eswatini rank
68th
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per capita over time
- Czechia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eswatini ahead.
Czechia ranks 65th and Eswatini ranks 68th of 206 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per capita, Czechia or Eswatini?
- Czechia, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Eswatini as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per capita between Czechia and Eswatini?
- 0 units per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Eswatini?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Eswatini rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per capita?
- Czechia ranks 65th and Eswatini ranks 68th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.