Cambodia vs Moldova: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per capita
Cambodia
0 units per person
in 2019
Moldova
0 units per person
in 2019
Cambodia rank
73rd
Moldova rank
70th
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per capita over time
- Cambodia
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Cambodia, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 73rd and Moldova ranks 70th of 206 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per capita, Cambodia or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Cambodia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per capita between Cambodia and Moldova?
- 0 units per person, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Moldova?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Moldova rank globally for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - afolu, per capita?
- Cambodia ranks 73rd and Moldova ranks 70th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - AFOLU divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.