Switzerland vs Tanzania: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management

Switzerland
340.12
in 2050
Tanzania
333.69
in 2050
Switzerland rank
58th
Tanzania rank
59th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management over time

  • Switzerland
  • Tanzania
100200300400196120052050

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 340.12 against 333.69 in Tanzania, a difference of 6.43.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.

Switzerland ranks 58th and Tanzania ranks 59th of 194 countries.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Switzerland Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 388.96 59.79 329.18 Switzerland
1970s 411.34 74.58 336.76 Switzerland
1980s 398.43 95.81 302.62 Switzerland
1990s 355.93 120.17 235.76 Switzerland
2000s 321.36 156.88 164.47 Switzerland
2010s 309.65 200.39 109.26 Switzerland
2030s 332.19 229.36 102.83 Switzerland
2050s 340.12 333.69 6.42 Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure management, Switzerland or Tanzania?
Switzerland, at 340.12 against 333.69 in Tanzania as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure management between Switzerland and Tanzania?
6.43, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and Tanzania?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Switzerland and Tanzania rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure management?
Switzerland ranks 58th and Tanzania ranks 59th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Switzerland vs Tanzania: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-manure-management/switzerland/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-manure-management/switzerland/tanzania/">Switzerland vs Tanzania: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 10,721 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).