Burkina Faso vs Costa Rica: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure

Burkina Faso
0.0013 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Costa Rica
0.0012 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
83rd
Costa Rica rank
86th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Costa Rica
00.0010.0010.002196119902019

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.0013 units per square kilometre against 0.0012 units per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 83rd and Costa Rica ranks 86th of 190 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.001 units per square kilometre 0.0009 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 0.0012 units per square kilometre 0.0012 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure, Burkina Faso or Costa Rica?
Burkina Faso, at 0.0013 units per square kilometre against 0.0012 units per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure between Burkina Faso and Costa Rica?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Costa Rica?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Burkina Faso and Costa Rica rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure?
Burkina Faso ranks 83rd and Costa Rica ranks 86th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Costa Rica: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-manure-management-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-manure-management-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/costa-rica/">Burkina Faso vs Costa Rica: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.