Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied

Hong Kong
0.0051 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Rwanda
0.0051 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
34th
Rwanda rank
35th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Rwanda
00.0050.010.0150.02196119902019

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0.0051 units per square kilometre against 0.0051 units per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 35th of 190 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0111 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0108 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
1970s 0.0174 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0169 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 0.0189 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0182 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 0.0088 units per square kilometre 0.0008 units per square kilometre 0.0079 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 0.0055 units per square kilometre 0.0019 units per square kilometre 0.0036 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 0.0054 units per square kilometre 0.0049 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied, Hong Kong or Rwanda?
Hong Kong, at 0.0051 units per square kilometre against 0.0051 units per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied between Hong Kong and Rwanda?
0 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Rwanda?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong and Rwanda rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied?
Hong Kong ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 35th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-manure-applied-to-soils-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-manure-applied-to-soils-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/">Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.