El Salvador vs Guatemala: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied

El Salvador
0.0038 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Guatemala
0.0043 units per square kilometre
in 2019
El Salvador rank
51st
Guatemala rank
48th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied over time

  • El Salvador
  • Guatemala
00.0020.0040.006196119902019

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0043 units per square kilometre against 0.0038 units per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0005 units per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 51st and Guatemala ranks 48th of 190 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0039 units per square kilometre 0.0011 units per square kilometre 0.0028 units per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0.0047 units per square kilometre 0.0014 units per square kilometre 0.0033 units per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.0044 units per square kilometre 0.0014 units per square kilometre 0.003 units per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.0045 units per square kilometre 0.002 units per square kilometre 0.0025 units per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.0054 units per square kilometre 0.0034 units per square kilometre 0.002 units per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0046 units per square kilometre 0.0041 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied, El Salvador or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.0043 units per square kilometre against 0.0038 units per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied between El Salvador and Guatemala?
0.0005 units per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Guatemala?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do El Salvador and Guatemala rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied?
El Salvador ranks 51st and Guatemala ranks 48th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Guatemala: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-manure-applied-to-soils-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-manure-applied-to-soils-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/guatemala/">El Salvador vs Guatemala: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.