What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - ipcc between Czechia and Lithuania?

0.001 units per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lithuania?

27 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Czechia vs Lithuania: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC

Czechia

0.0442 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Lithuania

0.0452 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Czechia rank

31st

Lithuania rank

29th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC over time

Czechia
Lithuania

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.0452 units per square kilometre against 0.0442 units per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 0.001 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Lithuania ahead.

Czechia ranks 31st and Lithuania ranks 29th of 206 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Czechia	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0402 units per square kilometre	0.0418 units per square kilometre	0.0016 units per square kilometre	Lithuania
2000s	0.036 units per square kilometre	0.0419 units per square kilometre	0.0059 units per square kilometre	Lithuania
2010s	0.0417 units per square kilometre	0.0453 units per square kilometre	0.0036 units per square kilometre	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - ipcc, Czechia or Lithuania?: Lithuania, at 0.0452 units per square kilometre against 0.0442 units per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - ipcc between Czechia and Lithuania?: 0.001 units per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lithuania?: 27 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2019.
How do Czechia and Lithuania rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - ipcc?: Czechia ranks 31st and Lithuania ranks 29th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Lithuania: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/czechia/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/czechia/lithuania/">Czechia vs Lithuania: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,762 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 27 August 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.