Aruba vs Equatorial Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Farm-gate

Aruba
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
0.0003 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Aruba rank
197th
Equatorial Guinea rank
196th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Farm-gate over time

  • Aruba
  • Equatorial Guinea
0000199020042019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0003 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.0002 units per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 2.3 times Aruba's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 197th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 196th of 208 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - farm-gate, Aruba or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0003 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - farm-gate between Aruba and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0002 units per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Equatorial Guinea?
30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
How do Aruba and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - farm-gate?
Aruba ranks 197th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 196th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Farm-gate emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Equatorial Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Farm-gate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-farm-gate-emissions-per-square-kilometre/aruba/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-farm-gate-emissions-per-square-kilometre/aruba/equatorial-guinea/">Aruba vs Equatorial Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Farm-gate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Farm-gate emissions, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 6,088 data points, 1990–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Farm-gate emissions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.