What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop between Saint Lucia and United States Virgin Islands?

0 units per square kilometre, with Saint Lucia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and United States Virgin Islands?

5 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1965.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Saint Lucia vs United States Virgin Islands: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop

Saint Lucia

0 units per square kilometre

in 1980

United States Virgin Islands

0 units per square kilometre

in 1992

Saint Lucia rank

178th

United States Virgin Islands rank

178th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop over time

Saint Lucia
United States Virgin Islands

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in United States Virgin Islands, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

Across all 5 years both countries report, United States Virgin Islands has been ahead every year.

Saint Lucia ranks 178th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 178th of 184 countries.

United States Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop, Saint Lucia or United States Virgin Islands?: Saint Lucia, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in United States Virgin Islands as of 1980.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop between Saint Lucia and United States Virgin Islands?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and United States Virgin Islands?: 5 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1965.
How do Saint Lucia and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop?: Saint Lucia ranks 178th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 178th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Lucia vs United States Virgin Islands: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-burning-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/st-lucia/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-burning-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/st-lucia/virgin-islands-u-s/">Saint Lucia vs United States Virgin Islands: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 184 places, 9,614 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 27 August 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.