Peru vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop

Peru
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Peru rank
128th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
131st

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop over time

  • Peru
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0000196119902019

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 128th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 131st of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Peru
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Peru
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop, Peru or Sao Tome and Principe?
Peru, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop between Peru and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 units per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Sao Tome and Principe?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Peru and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop?
Peru ranks 128th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 131st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-burning-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/peru/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-burning-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/peru/sao-tome-and-principe/">Peru vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 9,614 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.