How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Libya vs Namibia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop

Libya

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Namibia

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Libya rank

165th

Namibia rank

164th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop over time

Libya
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 165th and Namibia ranks 164th of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Libya	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Libya
1970s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Libya
1980s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Libya
1990s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Namibia
2000s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Libya
2010s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop, Libya or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Libya as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop between Libya and Namibia?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop?: Libya ranks 165th and Namibia ranks 164th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Namibia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-burning-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-burning-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/">Libya vs Namibia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 184 places, 9,614 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 27 August 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.