How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mongolia?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Mongolia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop

Congo

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Mongolia

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Congo rank

157th

Mongolia rank

156th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop over time

Congo
Mongolia

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.

Congo ranks 157th and Mongolia ranks 156th of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Mongolia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Mongolia
1970s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Mongolia
1980s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Mongolia
1990s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Mongolia
2000s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Congo
2010s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop, Congo or Mongolia?: Mongolia, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop between Congo and Mongolia?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mongolia?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Congo and Mongolia rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop?: Congo ranks 157th and Mongolia ranks 156th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mongolia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-burning-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-burning-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mongolia/">Congo vs Mongolia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 184 places, 9,614 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 27 August 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.